Saturday, April 12, 2003

Iraq - Democrat Meltdown? - We've all heard House Minority Leader Nancy "Facelift" Pelosi and her remark that "...We could have probably brought down that statue for a lot less".

As usual, she doesn't say exactly how, which continues a Democrat pattern of passive-aggressiveness on these sorts of issues.

Here's the part I find encouraging about this article:
Mrs. Pelosi also praised the troops at the rally. But she didn't address the war itself at the event. Later, in her news conference, she told reporters she is not convinced the war in Iraq has made Americans safer.
"That remains to be seen," she said. "I certainly would hope so, and I think we have to think in a very positive way about it, but we don't know."
That put her at odds with House Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer, Maryland Democrat, who said to some U.S. troops present at the rally: "Your cause is noble and just. You are disarming a dangerous despot and ending his ruthless regime."
He also said he believed the war was "strengthening the security of our nation, as well as the nations of the Middle East and the nations of the world."
Even Tom Daschle is laying low on this one; Iraq has burned him badly, even scuttled his presidential ambitions.

So we see Pelosi and the far left (Moseley-Braun, Dean, Nadler, etc) splitting from the more sensible moderates, just as the presidential campaign season gets underway. this is very good.

More Pelosi - From the same article, Pelosi said:
As Mrs. Pelosi praised the troops, she also said their success was owed "in large measure" to former President Bill Clinton.
"This best-trained, best-equipped, best-led force for peace in the history of the world was not invented in the last two years. This had a strong influence and strong support during the Clinton years," she said.
This part almost made me gag up my sugar pops.

Where does one start refuting this lunacy (which I've been hearing from Democrats ever since Afghanistan didn't turn into a quagmire)?

With serving soldiers who've been through several administrations? I know that my friends who are in the service can testify; the Clinton years were almost as bad as the Carter years, and had we not had the Reagan years in between the two, they shudder to think of how awful things would be. The Reagan years brought some things to the military that were as important to the military as money (as we found during the Clinton years): Pride, esprit de corps, a sense of deep-rooted professionalism that keeps a military together even when its tanks lack spare parts, a fifth of its planes are "hangar queens", where there was no money for the kind of training the saves soldiers' lives in combat.

This story was not atypical in showing the military's situation during the Clinton Administration:
Anyone who subscribes to Elaine Donnelly's Center for Military Readiness newsletter can give you a convincing disquisition on how the last decade saw Bill Clinton and his civilian appointees turn the Army into a Nerf version of its former self. From the assistant secretary Sara Lister, who was run out of town for calling Marines "extremist," to former Army secretary Togo West, who launched programs like COO ("Consideration of Others Training"), the leadership saw to it that troops were sensitized as often as they got haircuts. And as recruiting got harder (the Army missed its goal three out of the last five years), the culture grew softer. Even former defense secretary William Cohen—whose military career consisted of one day in ROTC—admitted that coed basic training lacked rigor. Meanwhile, after downsizing from 18 to 10 divisions, money is still scarce. As one angry Ranger tells me, "Because you have no money, you can't train, can't go on deployments, can't even afford to buy bullets. But because you have no money, you have plenty of time to do more Consideration of Others Training—because we've got to feel good about things. Hey, you know something?" he thunders. "The time for feeling good is over. We've got problems."


Yep, the military performed well in Iraq. You'd have to say it did well in spite of Clinton's efforts, not because of them.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/12/2003 09:00:58 AM

Paging Jesse Ventura - Fidel Castro, alarmed at the number of Cubans who are willing to resort to violent means to leave his island paradise (they have national health care, you know!), has executed three men who tried to hijack a ferry to the US. The executions were carried out after a drumhead kangaroo trial, according to the WaPo.
The men were prosecuted Tuesday in summary trials for "very grave acts of terrorism" and given several days to appeal their sentences, according to a statement read on state television.

However, the sentences were upheld both by Cuba's Supreme Tribunal and the ruling Council of State, and were carried out at dawn Friday, the statement said.
Castro must be alarmed; this seems to be becoming an epidemic:
The Baragua was hijacked a day after a Cuban passenger plane was hijacked to Key West, Fla., by a man who allegedly threatened to blow up the aircraft with two grenades. The grenades turned out to be fake.

Ten of the Cubans aboard that flight opted to remain in the United States and 19 others asked to go home.

Another Cuban plane was hijacked to Key West less than two weeks earlier.
Can you imagine this - over half the people who were on a random airplane (let's assume they weren't in on the plot until we know better) decide, on the spur of the moment, to defect to a foreign country on the drop of a hat, when a plane is hijacked.

Now...wasn't this the same country that our former Governor was sucking up to?
Ventura, for his part, says he was struck by Castro's seemingly good health.

"For his age, he looks in pretty good physical shape. And if our policy is is we're going to wait until he's gone, I would say we may be waiting a long time," Ventura said.

Ventura has publicly called for normalizing relations with Cuba sooner rather than later, and he discussed the point during an afternoon meeting with Cuba's minister of agriculture.

The governor says he and Minnesota agriculture commissioner Gene Hugson discussed what hot commodities Cuba might sell to Minnesotans if U.S. laws were relaxed to allow importation of Cuban goods. Ventura says he expects Cuban coffee and, of course, cigars, would be popular.
Yeah, I thought so.

Let's not forget - however badly you want your cigars and cheap vacation havens, Fidel Castro is a murderous thug and dictator. He's sponsored terror. He's sent troops around the globe to terrorize other people. The man is a worm.

Not that we need to invade them or anything. But normalizing relations without the sort of human rights improvements that would involve Fidel Castro sitting in solitary confinement is utterly wrong.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/12/2003 08:27:29 AM

Duh - The Los Angeles El Al shooting has been ruled a terrorist attack.
posted by Mitch Berg 4/12/2003 08:11:16 AM

Friday, April 11, 2003

Bitter? - We've seen the symptoms:
  • Anti-Bush protesters, marching in their thousands (or, lately, hundreds or dozens) complaining that the government and the "corporate media" are shutting them up. All x thousand/hundred/dozen of them.
  • "anti-war" activists who've had to successivily fall back from position to position; from "Afghanistan will be a quagmire" to the current "We won the war, but we will lose the peace" and "the "liberation" [always with the sneer quotes] of Iraq wasn't worth the human or social cost", and all the many, many steps in between (anyone remember "War won't work, Inspections will"? Weren't those quaint, trifling days?), and laying the groundwork for the next fallback position
  • The endless conspiracy-mongering - like yesterdays' bogus, specious attempt to debunk the celebrations in Baghdad, to the creating of a vast, Zionist conspiracy between the US and Israel, to promote Jewish hegemony in the Middle East
What are these? They are hallmarks of people who've taken some reverses in life, and the experince has made them bitter and recriminatory rather wiser.

Eliana Johnson and Jamie Kirchick, in an excellent article in Frontpage Magazine, explore how this paranoid bitterness is manifested at a "teach-in" at Yale:
Wrongfully assuming that the audience was filled with antiwar students, [History Professor Glenda] Gilmore found herself at a loss for words when her tenuous reasoning was accidentally exposed to critical questioning. It became clear that Gilmore was never in fact silenced. The opposite occurred; her views were exposed, disseminated, and legitimately criticized by those who disagreed with her. Coming from the insulated world of leftist academia, Gilmore assumed that criticism and denunciation of her vitriol was evidence of a conspiracy against her.
We're seeing this in the Twin Cities, too. On political discussion lists, criticism of leftist thought is being attacked - sometimes viciously - as "thuggishness" and "anti-free speech". As conservative talk host Jason Lewis has been saying for years, for these people, freedom of speech is not, apparently, for other people. It's the last refuge of the bully - in this case, the intellectual bully; to beat up one's opponent, and then cry "foul" when stood up to.

It goes on:
Rather than present well-developed or coherent arguments against the war, she filled her allotted time attempting (successfully) to elicit pity from her audience. It was a spectacle of self-aggrandizement.

Perhaps more than anything else, Yale’s anti-war “teach-in” shed light on the divide between the hawks and the doves that grows as American success in Iraq increases. While pro-war students have been vindicated by the liberation of Iraq and were rightfully ebullient on Wednesday, a common trope of the professors and their sycophantic followers in the student body was that a quick and easy military operation in Iraq should not be equated with a victory in the war.
"We could still lose the peace!", don't you know.

Here's the payoff:
Indeed, the conspiracy theories espoused by Gutas and Gilmore are a symptom of the hateful bitterness that characterizes the campus left in the face of American success. As Wednesdays’ panel demonstrated, vicious prevarication has become a substitute for honest argumentation. The jubilant celebrations in the streets of Baghdad, the crushing of Saddam’s Stalinist regime, and the kisses from Iraqis on American soldiers’ cheeks, undermine the words of Ivy League professors who purport to defend the interests of the people of Iraq from American military might.
Like most great academic theories (perforce of the left, since academia, especially in the social sciences, is so violently skewed that way), the theory doesn't often survive contact with the real world.

This is good news. We have a generation of college kids who, despite appearances at places like MacAlester, are much more conservative than their teachers. Deeply impacted by September 11 (as deeply as I was by the denouement of the Cold War, personally), they seem to be starting to reject the tropes of their elders. Perhaps we can look forward to a more enlightened, less insular, more genuinely diverse academy in 20 years.

Not a moment too soon.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/11/2003 10:31:51 AM

Shades of Weimar - The big challenge occurred to me last night.

CNN was broadcasting, live, pictures of an endless line of Iraqis - former soldiers who've shucked their uniforms and were dressed in a motley assortment of civilian garb - walking south. They were apparently largely Shi'ites from the south of Iraq - according to John Keegan, the Shi'ite majority was largely shunted into the cannon-fodder regular army units, and the Republican Guard were largely minority Sunnis like Hussein. And they were going to walk home. They were tired, hungry, and had had enough.

And I was reminded of the Weimar Republic - the post WWI German government formed after Kaiser Wilhelm abdicated his throne after the Armistice.

The stories aren't entirely parallel. Germany wasn't conquered; many of its prewar institutions - the civil service, the state-sponsored Lutheran and Catholic churches - survived intact.

But there were parallels as well: vicious factions; an international "governing" body whose principals couldn't agree on how to deal with the situation; and those endless lines of soldiers walking home from the front. Oh, yeah - and the French, acting in self-interest borne of vengeance back then (understandably so) and perfidy today.

Early in the war, I posted a theory of which I'd picked up scraps; the US was going to try to use the less Saddameriffic elements of the Iraqi army as the nucleus of a new Iraqi administration. We all blew that one - the regular Iraqi military put up even less of a fight than expected, and has effectively dissolved (except in scattered instances when they were driven into battle at gunpoint by the Guards and Fedayeen - and that didn't last long). Their cohesion and morale were even worse than we'd expected. For purposes of providing help with reconstruction, the Army as an institution seems to be completely useless.

And this provides us a challenge; doing something to keep all these unemployed men busy. Idle hands are the Devil's work, but they're also the radical's tools. It's the idle hands of the returning German soldier that that joined the gangs - really private armies - of the extreme left and extreme right political parties. The Communists, Socialists, Monarchists and (eventually) Nazis went on to fight pitched battles, literally, in the streets of Germany, accelerating the misery and discontent started by the implosion of the German economy (whose collapse long predated the Great Depression, from which it also suffered greatly).

Iraq has 26 million relatively literate, relatively educated people; their infrastructure is intact to a degree the Germans and Japanese of 1945 could only dream of hungrily; they have a national and cultural identity that the typical Afghan does not.

They just need something to do.

Which is one excellent reason to keep the French completely out. They are a nation that celebrates indolence, indeed institutionalizes it; Iraq needs hard work.

Starting from the clean slate is somthing the West generally does well at: we bombed in Germany in the twenties (largely due to the League of Nations' inability to curb France's thirst for economic vengeance and help introduce actual rule of law in Germany); we succeeded beyond history's wildest dreams in Germany and Japan after WWII; Eastern Europe is developing, after years of teething pains - the more market-oriented the society, the better they're doing.

Here's hoping we learn from the best of those lessons.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/11/2003 10:00:02 AM

Out of Spin - A friend of mine posted this article, "Out of Spin" by Lloyd Grove, on a different, non-political email discussion group. I'm normally loathe to post entire articles, but it's too good to pass up.

It's about the immense loss the the world's Public Relations industry in the disappearance of former Iraqi Information
Minister Mohammed Saeed "I'll Take You To The Airport" Sahhaf.

Grove says:
All over Washington, public relations professionals are distraught at the sudden disappearance from television screens of Iraqi Information Minister Mohammed Saeed Sahhaf.

"Many of us turned to his daily briefings just as people in this town look forward to their morning Starbucks," said veteran Democratic operative Dale Leibach, a principal in Prism Public Affairs and a man with an antic sense of humor. "We need to bring him over here to practice his amazing public relations skills. He has taken our profession, such as it is, to a level that is as inexplicable as it is humbling. I would hire him in a nanosecond."


In recent days, Sahhaf has dazzled professional spinmeisters here with his irrepressible optimism -- "The infidels are committing suicide by the hundreds on the gates of Baghdad" -- and his uncanny gift for the
mot juste, at one point referring to the United States, Great Britain and their supporters as a "gang of bloodsucking bastards."


Some of Sahhaf's greatest hits:

• "There is no presence of American infidels in the city of Baghdad."

• "We butchered the force present at the airport."

• "Iraqi fighters in Umm Qasr are giving the hordes of American and British mercenaries the taste of definite death."

• Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is "a criminal dog." Rumsfeld and President Bush "only deserve to be hit with shoes."

• "After we finish defeating all of those animals we will disclose that with facts and figures."

Leibach, a veteran of the Jimmy Carter White House and the offices of Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) and former senator Robert Torricelli (D-N.J.), told us: "There was great concern on Monday when we heard that his office was bombed. In all my years in this business, I have never seen
anyone handle himself with such 'skill' as he demonstrated during his press briefing yesterday -- with his Ministry of Information building literally on fire, causing him to move his news conference to the sidewalk, and with the flames visible behind him, saying with a straight face that they had 'the infidels' on the run, that the Iraqis are winning this war. They just don't teach you that in college. This is a
PR guy who may give new meaning to 'knowing how to take a bullet' for a client. Literally."
This piece is a treasure.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/11/2003 07:40:46 AM

Dr. Donald - I think we're looking at a boom market in Donald Rumsfeld impersonators.

This, from Esquire magazine, is a classic.

(Via Andrew Sullivan)

posted by Mitch Berg 4/11/2003 07:05:23 AM

The Story They Sat On - Eason Jordan of CNN writes about the Iraqi stories he couldn't tell.

And it's not from any political bias.
I came to know several Iraqi officials well enough that they confided in me that Saddam Hussein was a maniac who had to be removed. One Foreign Ministry officer told me of a colleague who, finding out his brother had been executed by the regime, was forced, as a test of loyalty, to write a letter of congratulations on the act to Saddam Hussein. An aide to Uday once told me why he had no front teeth: henchmen had ripped them out with pliers and told him never to wear dentures, so he would always remember the price to be paid for upsetting his boss. Again, we could not broadcast anything these men said to us.
That's just the beginning. The story goes into nauseating detail, yet obviously leaves a lot out.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/11/2003 07:03:45 AM

Thursday, April 10, 2003

Day of A Thousand Quotes - Today has seen an embarassment of riches in the quote department; I may have to set up a separate page for great quotes about the war and its denouement.

This is from a great Victor Davis Hanson article about Maureen Dowd's craven, scurillous, post-ironic columns on the war, its principals (at least the American ones) and its effects:
On a minor note, I was pleased to read that Maureen Dowd yesterday criticized things that I (a.k.a. "Mr. Davis") had written as consistent with the thinking of some in the administration. I confess that her writing has long bothered me, always in times of national distress reflecting an elite superficiality that is out of touch with most of us in the America she flies over. It is not just that for the last two years she has been wrong about Afghanistan, wrong about the efficacy of the war against terror, and wrong about Iraq — despite yesterday's surprising sudden admission that "We were always going to win the war with Iraq." The problem is more a grotesque chicness that quite amorally juxtaposes mention of tidbits like alpha males, Manhattan fashion — and her own psychodramas — with themes of real tragedies like the dying in the Middle East and war's horror.

So she just doesn't get it. It is precisely because Mr. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz hate war, wish to avoid a repeat of the vaporization of 3,000 in Manhattan and the specter of further mass killing from terrorists, armed with frightening weapons from rogue states like Iraq, that they resorted to force. She evokes Sherman (who called something like 19th century Dowdism "bottled piety") with disdain, but forgets that Sherman, who saw firsthand the grotesqueness of Shiloh, proclaimed that war was all hell — but only after his trek through Georgia where he freed 40,000 slaves and destroyed the icons of the Confederacy, while losing 100 soldiers and killing not more than 600 young non-slave-holding Southerners, an hour's carnage at Antietam or Gettysburg.

It might be neat between cappuccinos to write about leaders getting "giddy" about winning a terrible war, or thinking up cool nicknames like "Rummy," "Wolfie," and titles like "Dances with Wolfowitz," but meanwhile out in the desert stink thousands of young Americans, a world away from the cynical Letterman world of Maureen Dowd, risk their lives to ensure that there are no more craters in her environs — and as a dividend give 26 million a shot at the freedom that she so breezily enjoys.
This war will have lots of great side-effects; freedom for Iraq, a position to lean on other terrorists in Syria and Iran, removal of Iraq's WMDs from the world terror market. But I think the huge database of quotes suitable for future rhetorical blackmail is a nice side-effect as well.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/10/2003 11:50:18 PM

Speaking of Great Quotes - I often wish this blog could make enough money that I wouldn't have to work (or, lately, look for work). Don't get me wrong - the fact that you people donate enough money to support the actual running of the site itself is amazing, and I'm deeply thankful.

But if I did this fulltime, I could spend the time it took to keep track of things, like the dumb things anti-Bush protesters said before the war, and especially before the Race to Baghdad.

Fortunately, Andrew Sullivan has the time to do it. His latest round of Von Hoffman awards - given to egregiously bad predictions - is a classic.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/10/2003 09:52:20 PM

Quote of the Day - Hard to pick just one, but I love this, from David Warren:
Saddam Hussein had 30 years to make Iraq unliveable; naturally people such as the West's peace marchers in street and media expect the U.S. military to put it right in 30 minutes.
The whole article is great, and very much worth a read. But I love that quote.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/10/2003 09:38:17 PM

Commentary - I may put this Glenn Reynolds quote on a sign, for the next time I go to an anti-Bush rally:
What worries me is that there are still people -- who when agitating for "peace" pretended to have the Iraqis' interests at heart -- who would like to see Iraq descend into the depths again just so they can blame Bush and vindicate themselves. And they're not all in France.
Very true.

We'll be stalking writing about some of those, here in the Twin Cities, in coming days.


posted by Mitch Berg 4/10/2003 04:12:27 PM

Snatching Defeat from the Jaws of Victory - Hate site Democrats.com tries to impugn yesterday's famous pro-liberation demonstration in Baghdad, trying to pass it off as a small, controlled demonstration staged by the US.

Since Democrats.com always changes its front page around midnight eastern time, and never archives its lead stories (the better to avoid accountability), I'm going to snatch the picture for future reference:



Note the picture, that purports to show a tiny crowd gathered around the statue. The picture is shown without context, without timestamp, without any indication as to exactly when it was taken.

Compare the tiny crowd in the picture with the scenes you saw yesterday; does it look like the same group, at the same time, to you?

Ask yourself this; in a crowd that included the likes of Robert Fisk and the BBC World Service, do you think that a tiny little crowd could have been portrayed as a teeming mob, universally and without stint? Do you honestly think the world journalistic community is that dim and uninquisitive?

Am I wrong here? Let me know.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/10/2003 03:20:36 PM

Bipolar - Two different extremes here in Minnesota.

On the one hand, Minnesota's Iraqis. The Strib reports on their reactions:
"The Iraqi people lived a nightmare under Saddam Hussein, but now the nightmare is over," said Moslem Al-Jayashi of Fridley. "It's like a holiday today!" He stayed up all night Tuesday, watching developments on Al-Jazeera, the Arabic network.

On Wednesday afternoon, he and friends drove to the U.S. Courthouse in Minneapolis, waving American flags and patriotic signs to show their gratitude.

Another Iraq native, Yacoub Aljaffrey of New Brighton, said he wept with joy when he heard that U.S. troops had taken control of Baghdad.

"I cannot express how much happiness I feel, and how I thank the United States government and the troops that are fighting for our country," he said.

Said Rodwan Nakshabandi, a St. Paul restaurateur whose roots are Iraqi Kurdish: "The era of terror and brutality -- it's unbelievable it's ended."

It's hard to imagine the fear under which the Iraqi people have lived, said Adnan Shati of Minneapolis.

People were tortured and murdered by the secret police, who returned body parts in plastic bags to their families, he said.

Seeing the end of the war reminded him of visiting Iraq some time ago. "I was sitting in the living room and turned on the BBC. My younger brother jumped over me, grabbed the radio and turned it off. 'What are you doing? What if someone walked by and heard that? We could all die!' "

As Shati talked, his jubilant brother, Ali, phoned from Chicago: "Congratulations for free Iraq for getting rid of the monster!"
On the other hand, the "peace" movement, seemingly oblivious to the obsolescence of their cause, vows to continue...er, whatever it is they do. And what a contrast to their ebullient Iraqi neighbors these people are:
Willis Mattison, 59, former regional director of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency in Detroit Lakes, participates in a vigil at noon every Saturday in Detroit Lakes.

Those vigils, too, will continue, he said: "We may have inflicted as much harm on the Iraqi people by waging war there as Saddam Hussein was doing to his own people."
I'd love to see Mr. Mattison meet Mr. Shati, from earlier in this post, face to face.

One of the most irritating facets of the local anti-war movment is its appropriation of the ancient Christian tradition of the vigil. What was originally a humble group expression of prayer has been turned into a pretentious political statement of sorts.

And often one that is misguided to the point of hypocrisy:
One of the largest and oldest is on the Lake Street-Marshall Avenue Bridge over the Mississippi River on the border of Minneapolis and St. Paul. About 400 protesters were there Wednesday, and organizers handed out fliers saying the vigil will continue "as an ongoing symbol of our resistance to war and our efforts to promote peace through direct nonviolent action."
Non-violent, indeed. There've been reports of "non-violent" protesters spitting and throwing things at the counterprotesters that show up.

But it's ironic to note - as I will no doubt do next Wednesday - that peace has probably won a bigger victory through our armed action than it could have through another thirty years of vigils and faulty "containment" and "non-violent resolution".

posted by Mitch Berg 4/10/2003 09:33:40 AM

Terrible Swift Sword - Victor Davis Hanson writes this superb article about democracy's record in war.

Tyrants write us off in advance - and, the record shows, at their own peril.

The article is chock full of great observations. I like this one in particular:
It is easy to libel William Tecumseh Sherman and his terrible march through Georgia in autumn 1864, which covered about the same 300-mile distance through the heart of enemy territory as the present roll from Kuwait to Baghdad. But Sherman's exuberant army of Midwestern yeomen freed 40,000 slaves, killed no more than 600 Southern youth and targeted the icons of the Confederacy and the plantations of the secessionists. His critics, even at the time, protested that the use of force was inconsistent with the values of a liberal society. But Sherman called that "bottled piety" because they never explained how an evil like slavery or, we might add, Saddam Hussein is to be removed without violence.
Read the whole...er, you know.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/10/2003 08:36:37 AM

Light Flicks On - The Arab Street's reactions are fascinating:
Feeling betrayed and misled, some turned off their sets in disgust when jubilant crowds in Baghdad celebrated the arrival of U.S. troops.

"We discovered that all what the (Iraqi) information minister was saying was all lies," said Ali Hassan, a government employee in Cairo, Egypt. "Now no one believes Al-Jazeera anymore."
What? You mean Al Jazeera and Al Arabia weren't objective?

You don't have to search very far to find accounts of how the Iraqi-American Street is reacting to the news.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/10/2003 07:40:06 AM

Ach. Ptui - To wash the taste of Fisk out of my mouth, Lileks:
The Fog of Peace comes next; we will hear many stories of Setbacks and Troubling Developments and Roadblocks to Peace and the rest of the vocabulary the media deploys when a brutalized nation is freed from jail and does not immediately assume the characteristics of a Nebraska small-town school board. We’ll hear of many babies thrown out with the Ba’ath water, in other words. Today at the Pentagon press briefing, a reporter asked about Humanitarian Crisis, and Rumsfeld described at great length the humanitarian crisis that existed before the Allies got there, and how things were actually improving.
And you can't observe Rumsfeld without this:
It was classic Rummy; he not only refused to accept the premise of the question, he refuted it like a blacksmith working out marital frustrations on a red-hot horseshoe. You can just imagine what some of the reporters say to one another as they leave the briefing:

I say, what’s that in your hands, there? That pink thing?

Oh, this? It’s my ass. Rumsfeld handed it to me. And I see you have a nice clock there - brand new?

No, it’s quite old, but Rumsfeld cleaned it. Free of charge.
The dreaded blog directive follows: read the whole thing.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/10/2003 07:17:16 AM

Robert Fisk: "Journalist" of the "Liberation" - Robert Fisk, ultraliberal toady, wrote this about the liberation of Baghdad today:
The Americans "liberated" Baghdad yesterday,
Note the sneer quotes.

I should quit right here, because Fisk has already given his entire game away. Liberation is "liberation", in Robert Fisk's world. He and I inhabit very different places. Freedom - er, "freedom", to the likes of Robert Fisk, is something that pertains to journalists, not brown people who speak funny languages.
...but brought behind them an army of looters who unleashed upon the ancient city a reign of pillage and anarchy.
Most accounts say that it was pretty much the government buildings and Saddam's palaces that got looted.
It was a day that began with shellfire and air strikes and blood-bloated hospitals and ended with the ritual destruction of the dictator's statues. The mobs shrieked their delight. Men who, for 25 years, had grovellingly obeyed Saddam's most humble secret policeman turned into giants, bellowing their hatred of the Iraqi leader as his vast and monstrous statues thundered to the ground.
Note the implied ridicule; "they were big men, tackling statues...
"It is the beginning of our new freedom," an Iraqi shopkeeper shouted at me. Then he paused, and asked: "What do the Americans want from us now?' The great Lebanese poet Kalil Gibran once wrote that he pitied the nation that welcomed its tyrants with trumpetings and dismissed them with hootings of derision. And the people of Baghdad performed this same deadly ritual yesterday, forgetting that they – or their parents – had behaved in identical fashion when the Arab Socialist Baath Party destroyed the previous dictatorship of Iraq's generals and princes. Forgetting, too, that the "liberators" were a new and alien and all-powerful occupying force with neither culture nor language nor race nor religion to unite them with Iraq.
Just like in Japan.

Oh, wait - that would trash Mr. Fisks's preconceptions, woudn't it?
In Al-Fardus (Paradise) Square, US Marines helped a crowd of youths pull down the gaunt and massive statue of Saddam by roping it to an armoured personnel carrier. It toppled menacingly forward from its plinth to hang lengthways above the ground, right arm still raised in fraternal greetings to the Iraqi people.

It was a symbolic moment in more ways than one. I stood behind the first man to seize a hatchet and smash at the imposing grey marble plinth. But within seconds, the marble had fallen away to reveal a foundation of cheap bricks and badly cracked cement. That's what the Americans always guessed Saddam's regime was made of, although they did their best – in the late Seventies and early Eighties – to arm him and service his economy and offer him political support, to turn him into the very dictator he became.
It took Fisk about four minutes to exhume that strawman.

Mr. Fisk; we also supported Stalin, when he was our enemy's enemy. For that matter, many American and English leaders, including John F. Kennedy's father Joseph, and Henry Ford, supported Hitler. How complicit do you all feel?
In one sense, therefore, America – occupying the capital of an Arab nation for the first time in its history – was helping to destroy what it had spent so much time and money creating. Saddam was "our" man and yesterday, metaphorically at least, we annihilated him.
Let's do try to be honest here; France, Germany and Russia sent a thousand dollars to Hussein for every dollar we did. He was "our man" for a very brief window, twenty years ago, before Hussein developed into quite the criminal he has been for the last 15 years. Hussein was an old fling from long ago; France, Russia and Germany are still in bed with him.
Hence the importance of all those statue- bashing mobs, of all that looting and theft.

But of the real and somewhat less imposing Saddam, there was no trace.

Neither he nor his sons, Uday and Qusay, could be found. Had they fled north to their homeland fortress of Tikrit? Or has he – the most popular rumour this – taken refuge in the Russian embassy in Baghdad. Were they hiding out in the cobweb of underground tunnels and bunkers beneath the presidential palaces? True, their rule was effectively over. The torture chambers and the prisons should now be turned into memorials, the true story of Iraq's use of gas warfare revealed at last. But history suggests otherwise. Prisons usually pass over to new management, torture cells too, and who would want the world to know how easy it is to make weapons of mass destruction.

There will be mass graves that will have to be opened – though in the Middle East, these disinterments are usually performed in order to allow more blood to be poured onto the graves.
This is, of course, the same Fisk that was predicting world-class slaughter in Afghanistan. He just can't let that thread go.
Not that the nightmare is entirely over. For though the Americans will mark yesterday as their first day of occupation – they, of course, will call it liberation – vast areas of Baghdad remained outside the control of the United States last night.
Three days ago, all of it was outside our control.

Here, it gets interesting:
And at dusk, just before darkness curled over the land, I crossed through the American lines, back to the little bit of Saddam's regime that remained intact within the vast, flat city of Baghdad. Down grey, carless streets, I drove to the great bridges over the Tigris which the Americans had still not crossed from the west. And there, on the corner of Bab al-Moazzam Street, were a small group of mujahedin fighters, firing Kalashnikov rifles at the American tanks on the other side of the waterway. It was brave and utterly pathetic and painfully instructive.

For the men turned out to be Arabs from Algeria, Morocco, Syria, Jordan, Palestine. Not an Iraqi was among them. The Baathist militiamen, the Republican Guard, the greasy Iraqi intelligence men, the so-called Saddam Fedayeen had all left their posts and crept home. Only the foreign Arabs, like the Frenchmen of the Nazi Charlemagne Division in 1945 Berlin, fought on.
There's a great parallel here. Only the deluded from outside Iraq - the foreign zealots, the Robert Fisks, the matron from Highland Park with her "At Least Saddam Was Elected" sign at the "Peace" rally - attributes Hussein to be anything but a thug, a glorified gang-banger who has held power for thirty years because his thugs were bigger and badder than the opposition's thugs.
...tanks come in two forms: the dangerous, deadly kind and the "liberating" kind from which smart young soldiers with tanned faces look down with smiles at Iraqis who are obliging enough to wave at them, tanks with cute names stencilled on their gun barrels, names like "Kitten Rescue" and "Nightmare Witness" (this with a human skull painted underneath) and "Pearl". And there has to be a first soldier – of the occupying or liberating kind – who stands at the very front of the first column of every vast and powerful army.

So I walked up to Corporal David Breeze of the 3rd Battalion, 4th Marine Regiment, from Michigan. He hadn't spoken to his parents for two months so I called his mother on my satellite phone and from the other side of the world, Mrs Breeze came on the line and I handed the phone to her son.

And so this is what the very first soldier to enter the centre of Baghdad told his family yesterday evening. "Hi you guys. I'm in Baghdad.

"I'm ringing to say 'Hi! I love you. I'm doing fine. I love you guys. The war will be over in a few days. I'll see you all soon.''

Yes, they all say the war will be over soon. There will be a homecoming no doubt for Corporal Breeze and I suppose I admired his innocence despite the deadly realities that await America in this dangerous, cruel land. For even as the marine tanks thrashed and ground down the highway, there were men and women who saw them and stood, the women scarved, the men observing the soldiers with the most acute attention, who spoke of their fear for the future, who talked of how Iraq could never be ruled by foreigners.
Just the way you were saying Afghanistan could never be liberated by Americans, not so very long ago, Robert Fisk.

It goes on from there. Read it, if you have the stomach.

Er..."stomach".

posted by Mitch Berg 4/10/2003 07:07:10 AM

Wednesday, April 09, 2003

Miller - I caught part of Dennis Miller on Leno last week. No, honest, Miller was the only reason I tuned in. Criminy.

I wanted to transcribe his whole bit, because it has some great, .sig-file caliber lines, but I forgot most of them by the time I got the the computer.

Fortunately, someone did it for me, summarizing his remarks on a bunch of topics:
-- Pride in conduct of the war:
“I cannot tell you how proud watching that war coverage makes me. I know a lot of people are saying that they think that it's, that you know what we're doing is imperialistic. I watch the way we handle ourselves over there and I've never felt more patriotic in my life.”

-- Denouncing anti-war protesters, Miller described how he puts them into four categories, the second one made up of those who call everyone but Hussein a Hitler:
“The second type you have at these parades seems to be the people who want to mislabel Hitler. Everybody in the world is Hitler. Bush is Hitler, Ashcroft is Hitler, Rumsfeld is Hitler. The only guy who isn't Hitler is the foreign guy with a mustache dropping people who disagree with him into the wood chipper. He's not Hitler.”

-- On the up side of war protesters:
“I'll say this about the war protesters: At least most of them are only putting duct tape across their mouths so I can still tell the rest of them to blow it out their ass.”

-- On the Dixie Chicks:
“Surprisingly, making fun of the President on foreign land in a time of war doesn't seem to play with the NASCAR crowd!”

-- On Peter Arnett:
“How am I supposed to trust the honesty of a reporter that has that bad of a comb-over on top of his head? He's got four hairs left and he's swirling them around...This guy is dangerously close to pulling hair over from another guy's head. Hey guess what Pete? We know you're bald, okay? The outside of your skull is as empty as the inside.”

-- On Michael Moore:
“He's going to wake up every day for the rest of his life, and he's going to tell us how he hates everything about this country except his right to hate it. And then we say that we love it and he's going to tell us what naive sheep we are and that he's the true patriot because he hates it and he sees all the problems in it. Yeah, right, Mike. You know something, if my yawn got any bigger they'd have to assign it a hurricane name, okay?
“Michael Moore simultaneously represents everything I detest in a human being and everything I feel obligated to defend in an American. Quite simply, it is that stupid moron's right to be that utterly, completely wrong.”

-- On justification for the war:
“It is stupid for anybody in the world to say they're for war. But I am for this war because, you know, we've got to protect ourselves now. And we've got to remind the world that there is a point that we will not be pushed past before the [bleep]hammer comes down. Now, the simple fact is, do I think Saddam Hussein can bury the nuclear jumper from the top of the key? No, I don't. He's a putz. But I do think he can distribute the ball going down the lane and I think we've got to smack him around. It's time to circle the SUVs!
“The simple fact is, you've got to view this war like we've been on a long family car ride. Bush is the father and he's been screaming [gestures with arm as if a driver scolding kids in back seat] 'don't make me come back there!' for around 200 miles now and it just reached the point where we had to pull the car over and the bad kid is going to get the spanking of his life.”

-- On those whining about the length of the war:
“And now we've got people whining about how long the war is taking. For God's sakes it's been two weeks. You know, it took Joe Millionaire eight weeks to pick Zora (sp?).”

-- On global warming:
“There's a lot of differing data, but as far as I can gather, over the last hundred years the temperature on this planet has gone up 1.8 degrees. Am I the only one who finds that amazingly stable? I could go back to my hotel room tonight and futz with the thermostat for three to four hours. I could not detect that difference.”

-- Advise to soldiers in Iraq:
“I would encourage the boys though not to rip down all those big wall portraits of Hussein because you got to remember, pretty soon we're going to need a headstone for my main man's grave and you might want to save one for him.”

-- Praising the troops:
“God knows that we've got things we've got to perfect in this country. But there's enough people downplaying it right now. I want to go so far against that. I want to thank the President. I want to thank the troops and say God bless you for doing the tough job which allows us to sit here and do the easy jobs, like be on the Tonight Show.”
I liked Miller even before he came out of the closet as an occasional libertarian-conservative.

Between Miller, P.J. O'Rourke and Drew Carey, I'm getting pretty happy with the right-wing comedy corps these days.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/9/2003 07:58:33 PM

The Lou Reed Curse - A pox on Eric Alterman's politics, but he does some great music writing.

In this article, he talks aboutthe Lou Reed Curse:
A few days later, I was telling this story to my close friend, Mike, who lived in Washington. He told me of the curse that Lou had cast on his life. I don’t remember all the details, but Mike was the Lou Reed fan to end all Lou Reed fans from the time he attended Columbia as an undergrad for about a decade and a half. That’s when Lou’s curse began to take effect. I forget the details, but it was no joke. Mike would always put on one of Lou’s albums mark the key moments of his life and something would always go horribly wrong. Girls would dump him; his wife had a miscarriage and I forget what else, but it was bad. He never listened to his favorite artist ever again. I tried to think of what life would be like if I felt forced to exile myself from Bruce Springsteen or Bob Dylan. I couldn’t bear it
That's just the beginning - it gets much better.

Unlike, say, his political commentary.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/9/2003 05:59:06 PM

Gotcher Crow Right Here - A month ago, this list (and the local left in general) was all abuzz about what a bad idea this war was going to be.

Two weeks ago, the "Q" word - quagmire - was everywhere on this mailing list. The Administration was jeered as shortsighted, inept, presiding over a plan that was doomed to quagmire and stalemate at the very least. The plan was derided for having only one heavy division, requiring that we empty the US Army wholesale into an endless morass. Our diplomacy was dinged for failing to open a second front (while the French interference in the Turkish parliamentary process went unacknowedged). The "V" word - Vietnam - was broached with a straight face.

Some of us said "wait and see".

We waited. Let's see:

Most of Baghdad has poured into the streets to greet our troops. Foreign mercenaries and volunteers are being turned in wholesale by angry Iraqis.

Today, the Rumsfeld/Franks operational plan for taking Iraq is being complemented by the experts. The Dash to Baghdad is already being hailed as one of the great armored advances under fire in history:
The stunning advance, at a cost of fewer than 10 U.S. combat deaths, would silence complaints by television generals, and even some officers in the field, that the war was being mismanaged. It also would provoke another kind of talk.

"The U.S. advance on Baghdad is something that military historians and academics will pore over in great detail for many years to come," British Air Marshal Brian Burridge said Monday. "They will examine the dexterity, the audacity and the sheer brilliance of how the U.S. put their plan into effect."
Instead of getting bogged down in pitched battles for cities along the road to Baghdad, U.S. forces raced directly to their main objective, pausing to fight only when given the chance to exact a heavy toll on the Iraqis. " Hey - wasn't that one of the things our plan was getting beaten up over two weeks ago?

Well?

Three weeks. Fewer casualties than the 1991 Gulf War or the 1982 Falklands War. Fewer casualties than the Second Battalion of the 330th Infantry Regiment suffered in *one week* in the Hürtgen Forest in 1944 (from a book I ghostwrote a while ago) advancing two miles.

No, the war's not over. There is some heavy skirmishing going on; according to some reports, much of the opposition is coming from foreigners and Ba'ath hardliners. But you can see the light at the end of the tunnel.

The "Arab Street" - at least, the one in Baghdad - is voting with its feet on its opinion of the US liberation of their country, with jubilation on the streets that looks even more intense than the fall of the Berlin Wall (another event that broke many a lefty heart).

Given the abuse that the Administration - and those of us who supported the liberation of Iraq - took on this mailing list, I think it's only appropriate to mention these things.

See you on V-I day!

I'm going to mosey down to the Marshall-Lake Bridge and see how things are going. I'll report later.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/9/2003 02:49:38 PM

Open Letter to Protesters - This note appeared on the Minnesota National Politics discussion list, in a topic about Minnesota's clacque of anti-Bush protesters. I liked it, and am using it with permission.
I don’t think there is any questions that the majority of Americans and Minnesotans believe that those people out protesting the war in Iraq weeks ago were Anti-American professional protesters who if the war was not the issue of the day, would be out protesting something else. In other words the usual suspects who regardless of the issue not only fall on the left side, but the far left side.

They are a tiny fraction of a minority of America, there candidates can not get elected to office, and there views, when fully explained to the masses are laughed at and ridiculed. When one of them does attain some degree of notoriety and is paid attention to in an electoral situation there views are such that they do more harm than good to there movement (See Ken Pentel and the Minnesota Green Party). For the most part there are politically irrelevant, except on lists such as these which allow them to spout there drivel to the masses and afford them some degree of credibility that they are unable to receive in the real world.

Once again what has happened in Iraq has proved not only there dire predictions wrong, but has shown them for what they are, anti-American professional protesters who care little for anyone, other than themselves and there warped world view. The fact is simple Americans, Minnesota and now the World is rejecting these far left people who protest on a dime, who left to there own devices could not govern a fraternity, let alone a nation.

The professional protesters are not gone, just proven wrong on this issue-next week they will be back, protesting Governor Pawlenty, Mayor Kelly or maybe even Mayor R.T. Rybak. Once again average ordinary Americans will be forced to listen to this minority drone on and steal precious resources from society as a whole .just to get out there bigoted,mean spirited and hatful message.
Of course there's a right to protest. There were even rational reasons to oppose the war, if you wanted to find them.

But so many of the anti-Bush protesters have taken such incredible leave, not only of reason, but of simple morality. Opposing the war, in full cognizance of the evil Hussein represented and the things he'd done meant supporting Hussein; agreeing with institutional rape, the torture cells, the child prisons, the nerve gassed families. To end the war at that point - go "Support the troops by bringing them home" - would have been to deny liberty, and unleash a degüello on the Iraqi people like we haven't seen since...

...since the last time we betrayed them, at the behest of the UN.

So yeah, I'll be going to the demonstration today. If there is one.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/9/2003 01:59:13 PM

Same the World Over - Footage on CNN a bit about of a US Marine walking through a building on the campus of Baghdad University.

As he walked a young, shrill Arab woman harangued him, in excellent English, pointing at a poster: "Do you see these heroes? They are going to come to America and blow you up!"

The leatherneck just kept walking, scanning the area ahead of him, studiously ignoring her.

The scary part was, she was indistinguishable from many of the little cretins I run into at demonstrations here in Minnesota. The good news for her? MacAlester will probably give her a full scholarship.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/9/2003 01:43:55 PM

Paging Captain Smith - International A.N.S.W.E.R. is planning another round of anti-Bush rallies this weekend, including in DC.

I plan on going down to the Marshall-Lake Bridge in a bit, to see if the usual suspects are clogging up the bridge down there today. Anyone wanna meet me by the old gas station on the St. Paul side? Email me by three-ish - I'm in!

posted by Mitch Berg 4/9/2003 01:38:44 PM

Amazing - I didn't expect to see a day like this. I expected something like Germany or Japan - a shell-shocked populace slowly waking and getting its feet wet with the idea of freedom.

A stunning day.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/9/2003 01:34:29 PM

The Children's Jail - Lileks, on what the Children's Prison really means:
The end result of a fascist regime is always this: a man who seeks advancement by proposing a children’s jail; a smarter man who sees the political advantage of building one; the men who lock the doors and make the gruel with dead empty hearts, and the man who worries what will happen to him if the jail is found wanting.

The children, of course, don’t matter at all. In fact they matter least of all, and after a while their jailers come to hate them for what they make the jailers do.

A daisy chain of snakes biting their tales. Look up at the portrait hanging on the wall. Ask yourself what he wants. Bite harder.
So - does the left think Cuba is any better? North Korea?

So who is this they want to co-exist "peacefully" with?

I still don't recall Hals Blix looking for the children..

posted by Mitch Berg 4/9/2003 01:36:09 AM

Leave Nobody Behind - One of the most fascinating stories so far has been that of Navy Lieutenant-Commander Scott Speicher, a pilot shot down on the first night of the Gulf War.

The 1991 Gulf War.

The story is still alive, as the Navy, operating on evidence dug up by Amy Waters Yarsinske, civilian reporter, over the last several years.

Speicher, then 33, was piloting a Navy F/A-18 Hornet jet when enemy fire shot it down January 17, 1991 -- the first day of the Persian Gulf War. He subsequently was declared the war's first combat death, but the U.S. Navy changed his status to missing in action in 2001 after receiving information that he may have survived.

His status was changed a third time in October to missing-captured.

In a memorandum announcing the change, Navy Secretary Gordon England said the decision was based on the following factors:

• Analysis of the wreckage concluded that Speicher survived the initial damage to the aircraft and ejection.

• The flight suit found near the wreckage and turned over by the Iraqis showed no signs of a crash impact, as it would have if the pilot had been in the plane when it hit.

• The Red Cross team that investigated the wreckage reported that the cockpit had been expertly dismantled.

• Cumulative information received since Speicher was shot down continues to suggest strongly that the Iraqi government can account for him.
I heard Waters Yarsinske on (ahem) the KQ Morning show last week. The story she tells goes way beyond the fairly clinical details in the CNN articles; she alleges (and claims her allegations have been backed up by US intelligence - which would seem to be supported by the Navy altering his status) that Speicher lived among the Bedouin of the western Iraqi desert for a few years, hiding out with a broken leg, until a neighboring tribe gave him up (resulting in the massacre of the tribe that had hidden him).

Most damningly, she claims, the Clinton Administration was given the same evidence that she's given the Bush team. They didn't want to hear about it - preferring (she said on the radio) to concentrate on getting more women and gays into the military.

Although finding clues as to Speicher's fate has to be a lower priority, it is apparently on the military's agenda now that they're in Iraq.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/9/2003 01:09:27 AM

Whoops - Yes, I moved the blog to my new domain. It was simpler than I thought.

More changes to come soon.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/9/2003 12:10:18 AM

Tuesday, April 08, 2003

More - For those who still think that we should have left Hussein alone:
More than 100 children held in a prison celebrated their freedom as US marines rolled into northeast Baghdad amid chaotic scenes which saw civilians loot weapons from an army compound, a US officer said.

Around 150 children spilled out of the jail after the gates were opened as a US military Humvee vehicle approached, Lieutenant Colonel Fred Padilla told an AFP correspondent travelling with the Marines 5th Regiment.

"Hundreds of kids were swarming us and kissing us," Padilla said.
What? Hans Blix missed this? Who'da thunk it?

The kids were in jail, according to the story, because:
"The children had been imprisoned because they had not joined the youth branch of the Baath party," [Col. Padilla] alleged. "Some of these kids had been in there for five years."
Wow. Imagine how much better this would have been with UN support.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/8/2003 08:45:28 PM

Top Five Signs Your Movement Is Losing Steam - Drum roll, please:

5. Canadians now support the war by a 2-1 margin.

4. Le Figaro is editorializing in favor of the war.

3. The Guardian is writing some of the best pro-liberation material.

2. Even the Strib is being uncommonly muted in its anti-war opinions...

And the #1 Sign Your Movement is Losing Steam:

1. A majority of San Franciscans support the war!

(Via Sullivan and Reynolds)

posted by Mitch Berg 4/8/2003 05:18:00 PM

My "Representative" - Betty McCollum is my "representative" in Congress - I put it in quotes, because while she does sit in the chair reserved for Minnesota's Fourth Congressional District, I find that she doesn't represent me in the least.

Least of all in the current flap, as told in the Strib this morning:
U.S. Rep. Betty McCollum, D-Minn., asked Sen. Norm Coleman to apologize on Monday after the Republican senator told a Capitol Hill newspaper that he's "a 99 percent improvement" over his predecessor, the late Democratic Sen. Paul Wellstone.

"To be very blunt and God watch over Paul's soul, I am a 99 percent improvement over Paul Wellstone," Coleman said in a front-page story published in Roll Call. "Just about on every issue."
Now, the Strib supplies the key piece of context that Rep. McCollum omits in her statement:
Coleman made the remark as he sought to stress his ties to President Bush. He told Roll Call that Wellstone "was never with the president."

McCollum called the remarks inappropriate and disrespectful and said they were "an unnecessary attack on a leader our state continues to mourn."
Ms. McCollum? As much as some of you loved Senator Wellstone, and as much as many of his opponents respect him, life is for the living. Mourning ends.

And, frankly, Rep. McCollum, Senator Coleman is under no obligation to suck up to Senator Wellstone's memory, any more than President Bush was obliged by the close election in 2000 to adopt Algore's platform.

Norm Coleman is our Senator now!.
In a statement released by his office Monday night, Coleman said: "[Mark] Twain said the problem with talking to the media is they're likely to print what you say. It was my responsibility to be more clear in my remarks to Roll Call. It was my understanding we were comparing my relationship to this White House to the relationship Senator Wellstone had with this White House. I would never want to diminish the legacy or memory of Senator Paul Wellstone, and I will accept full responsibility for not having been more accurate in my comments."
Seems like an honest clarification of something that wasn't a mistake in the first place,

Minnesota Democrats obviously see it differently:
The Roll Call story caused an uproar among Wellstone's former staffers.

Jim Farrell, Wellstone's former spokesman, called it a "shameful, self-serving assertion" from Coleman.

And Jay Howser, a former senior aide, called the remarks "sickening" and said they showed Coleman to be "a selfish, classless" man.

For Coleman to attack Wellstone less than six months after his death "is beyond the believable," he said. "One would think that no U.S. senator would ever stoop to such a disgusting level but today Norm Coleman has."

McCollum said the remarks were hurtful to the Wellstone family and to all Minnesotans who loved Wellstone and his wife, Sheila, both of whom died Oct. 25 in a plane crash.
All very small and petty, don't you think? Here's the part that I liked the best, though:
Saying the 2002 campaign is over and it's "now time for leadership," McCollum called on Coleman to apologize to Wellstone's family and to all Minnesotans

"Paul Wellstone represented Minnesota families with integrity, respect and passion for 12 years," she said. "Senator Coleman's remarks attacking our late senator were tasteless and do absolutely nothing to benefit the Minnesota families he now serves."
Democrats! It's time to stop waving Paul Wellstone's image like an Orthodox icon before you as you walk! Minnesotans have moved on to deal with a war, a tough economy, and a state budget addled by your free-spending history; Move On!

Coleman finishes with a salient quote:
In the story, Coleman reflected on his election to the Senate and said "there is a lot of anger" still coming from Wellstone forces.

"They lost their champion and they thought something was taken away," he told the newspaper. "All you can do is say, 'Hey, I mourn the loss, but I am here and I am going to do what I think is the right thing to do, and thank God I have a chance to be here.' "
It's a lot more than anger, I think. It's the contempt that those who feel themselves entitled feel for those they believe are the usurpers. Applied to invidividuals, it's a sign of a person that's on his or her way to becoming an angry, bitter person. The Minnesota DFL seems to fit that description.

As do many Democrats, including Democrat hate site Democrats.com, which misleadingly sluglined its linked AP story "Norm Coleman Trashes Paul Wellstone's Memory".

Note to Democrats at all levels; keep this up. Nobody likes a whiner. Keep dangling Wellstone in front of the voters, and you'll be a minor party by 2012.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/8/2003 04:44:20 PM

Three Months - That's how long I've been out of work.

Now bear in mind, I'm not one of those people who likes being out of work. Truth be told, I'm a bit of a workaholic. I've had to moderate that impulse quite a bit in the last few years; raising kids'll do that, if you're a lucky workaholic.

And I'm not totally out of work; I've picked up a few freelance contracts that have stretched my unemployment a bit. And I'm here to testify, looking for work is a fulltime gig; I've probably sent out 250 resumes in the last three months.

But the fact is, I've been job-hunting nonstop for three months, and it's starting to show.

I have three fairly solid job leads right now; one that I interviewed for on Valentines Day, that absolutely wants to hire me, but the budget still hasn't been approved; one that popped up two weeks ago and is still developing; and the one with the nearly-eight-hour second interview last week. The latter is being incredibly persnickety, interviewing a rolling cattlecall of human factors and usability people. If I end up finishing second of 12 candidates...well, it's still finishing second. Granted, the interview seemed to go very well, but...blah. There are a few other possibilities, but nothing worth talking about.

They say to remember "you are not your job". True. But I'm starting to identify pretty closely with my lack of job, and that can't be a good thing.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/8/2003 08:59:45 AM

Monday, April 07, 2003

Casualties of War - It's almost specious to point this out, but here goes:

In 1991, we lost 147 dead in four days of fighting; about a quarter of them were "friendly fire" deaths.

Today, in almost three weeks of land combat, we've lost about eighty dead. Half are due to accidents, according to the military.

We've lost two fixed-wing aircraft in action (one of them a Brit shot down by a US Patriot battery) and three (if I recall correctly) helicopters to enemy fire. In 1991, we lost more than a dozen in the month we were in action; the Brits alone lost five Tornadoes, and the Italians lost another.

In exchange - the war seems nearly at an end, as opposed to the very limited goals we won in '91.

Just to keep things in perspective.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/7/2003 10:18:00 PM

It's a Gas - For the past day or so, the left's latest intellectual rear-guard action has been "See! No Weapons of Mass Destruction!"

The anti-Bush left's intellectual rear-guard is folding up like the Republican Guard these days; the 101st Airborne seems to have discovered Sarin and Tabun gases at a compound southwest of the Bagh:
The evacuation of dozens of soldiers Sunday night followed a day of tests for the nerve agent that came back positive, then negative. Additional tests Sunday night by an Army Fox mobile nuclear, biological and chemical detection laboratory confirmed the existence of sarin.

Sgt. Todd Ruggles, a biochemical expert attached to the 2nd Brigade of the 101st Airborne said, "I was right" that chemical agents Iraq has denied having were present.

In addition to the soldiers sent for decontamination, a Knight Ridder reporter, a CNN cameraman and two Iraqi prisoners of war also were hosed down with water and bleach.

U.S. soldiers found the suspect chemicals at two sites: an agricultural warehouse containing 55-gallon chemical drums and a military compound, which soldiers had begun searching Saturday.
Growing up in North Dakota, I saw lots and lots of legitimate agricultural chemicals. Some of them are even from the same chemical family as Sarin and Tabun.

But - ! - there's more!
The soldiers also found hundreds of gas masks and chemical suits at the military complex, along with large numbers of mortar and artillery rounds.
You find farmers trying the damnedest things to apply pesticides, but mortar and artillery rounds usually didn't top the list.

Pack it up, left. It's over.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/7/2003 05:42:38 PM

Fantasy Life - I love this this editorial in the relatively-liberal Die Zeit. The translation from the German is via Google; I could have done a better job, if I'd had an hour or two to spend on it.

This paragraph - which I'll translate myself - sums it up:
To replace unpleasant historical realities by denial of the facts, and arbitrarily making up fictitious events - that is not new. So far the "Geschichtsleugner" (History Liars) had however always used a certain spatial or historical distance, a certain time at least, until the primary memory of the material facts had already faded a little, before they dared take their fabrications public. Now the events are already denied and expunged, as if they never happened. These falsifications made for preaching to the choir: those convinced of the fact from the beginning that everything that comes from American side must be a lie.
Google translations are amazingly bad at times (and at the same time miracles of of technology), but this one gets the basic idea across; many of the Anti-Americans live in a fantasy world, where US troops mow down Iraqi children like cordwood and where the Iraqi Street seethes with resentment against us.

I'll be here in six months to compare reality with this fantasy. I'll be naming names - and sending emails.

Count on it.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/7/2003 05:25:32 PM

Busted? - We've had false alarms before - but this might be it; US forces discover possible chemical weapons in two separate finds near Baghdad - one involving drums of chemicals, and this one:
The U.S. National Public Radio, reporting what appeared to be a separate discovery to the one in Albu Mahawish, said U.S. forces found a weapons cache of around 20 medium-range missiles equipped with potent chemical weapons.

NPR said the rockets, BM-21 missiles, were equipped with sarin and mustard gas and were "ready to fire."
Smoking gun?

posted by Mitch Berg 4/7/2003 03:49:20 PM

Black Watch News - This story has three of my favorite things: bagpipes, Challenger main battle tanks (about as good as an M1, and much cooler-looking) and a leftie myth being shot down (in this case, "Urban Combat will totally chew up the coalition forces; that's where we'll get our quagmire!").

Gethin Chamberlain of Glasgow's The Scotsman sets the stage:
On the other side of the bridge over the Shatt al-Basra canal, Lieutenant William Colquhoun had unpacked his bagpipes and sat on the turret of his Warrior waiting for the order to advance. As the sun attempted to poke through smoke rolling lazily across desolate marshland stretching away on either side of the bridge, wading birds were picking their way among the long grasses.

As he began to play, the sound of Scotland the Brave drifted across the bridge towards the city, competing with the clatter of rotor blades as four Cobra helicopters raced in to join the attack.
Read the whole story - it's a fascinating look at restrained, modern urban combat.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/7/2003 09:14:40 AM

Alternatives - The Strib asks the unanswerable question: "When will the DFL actually come up with a budget plan of its own?"
And as expected, Speaker Steve Sviggum made much of the fact that his caucus has declared its fiscal intentions, while the DFLers in charge of the Senate have not. Two posters were propped on easels as Sviggum presented the House plan. One poster detailed the House GOP's proposal; the other was blank but for the headline, "House/Senate DFL budget plan."
The GOP should rub it in.

The DFL is fading back into passive-aggressive mode; not suggesting anything of its own, holding itself to sniping at the GOP. It's the safe approach; sort of like letting the other guy poke his head into the tiger cage, then criticizing his technique.

But as they say, nothing ventured, nothing gained. The DFL are venturing nothing; venture also brings risks. With the economy the way it is, and Minnesota's voter still unsure on their conservative legs, it may be the safe route.

The Strib continues:
It's a void that is crying to be filled -- and will be filled this week, DFL leaders vow. It would best be filled by a clear alternative to the deep cuts the Republicans have proposed -- in other words, by a budget that combines more modest service cuts with a state tax increase.
And that's probably what it'll be; full of sops to the public-sector employees and the special interests that essentially are the DFL.
Odds are against such a budget being adopted this year. But the political reality of the 2003 session is that the odds do not favor the adoption of any budget with DFL parentage.
When dealing with the Minneapolis Star/Tribune, it's hard to read between that statement's lines. Is the statement

  • Shorthand for a belief that last November was jut a hallucination, that Minnesotans really do like high taxes, but are just in a temporary GOP fling? Or...
  • A sign that the DFL-leaning Strib is slowly coming around, but can't quite admit it? Saying "the Legislature won't pass something with DFL lineage" goes down easier than saying "Voters are sick of high taxes".

The Strib continues
The DFL may control the Senate by two votes. But with the House and the governor in Republican lockstep, the DFL is a de facto minority, consigned to playing the minority's role. It's a role that needs to be played well.

The minority's role is neither to echo the majority, nor to simply criticize the majority's ideas. It is to present principled alternatives, and advocate for them in a way that attempts to educate and persuade the public. A vigorous minority does not just say that there must be a better way; it shows the better way.
We'll have to look and see what kind of "way" the DFL shows us. I'm suspecting "same old same old". We'll see shortly.
DFLers undoubtedly would tweak the Pawlenty budget in different places. But tweaking is not the same as standing apart, or standing for principle. If DFLers are sincere when they say that the Republican approach is detrimental to Minnesota, they are honor-bound to propose a real alternative.
They are, indeed.

I'll be waiting.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/7/2003 08:26:32 AM

Focus - Believe it or not, I never set out to do a warblog. Yeah, military history has always fascinated me - and since I'm a straight male (despite the fact that I own a potpourri heater) I naturally am drawn to any piece of news involving tanks and artillery.

But this last couple of days has been kinda out of hand.

So I'm going to make a special effort to include some non-military, non-non-Minnesota things in the blog this week.

Unless, like, things really heat up.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/7/2003 07:28:03 AM

Sunday, April 06, 2003

If It Ain't Broke, Fix It? - According to Drudge, Steven Brill is getting personally trashed by the chattering classes for his new book "After: How America Confronted the September 12 Era".

His crime? Admitting the administration is doing a good job.

Says Drudge:
why have there been no fresh terror strikes in the United States since the start of the war?

Brill says it's the competence of the current leadership.

PBS host Charlie Rose shouted and squirmed and called Brill's premise "ridiculous" during a promo for the book "After: How America Confronted the September 12 Era," which Brill released last week.

[AFTER ranked #678 on the AMAZON.COM sales parade Sunday afternoon.]

"He is a laughing stock!" mocked one network executive, who has been a friend of the self-described "lapsed-liberal" for more than 10 years.

Brill has been telling associates how arguments over the 700-page book have "nearly become violent."
I'm sure they have. There's nothing the left hates worse than apostacy. The only thing worse than a conservative is a liberal that has switched sides. Brill apparently even commits the ultimate sin; praising John Ashcroft and aspects of the Patriot Act.

As a personal aside, here's the part I love, again from Drudge:
Brill explains: "I’ve had a kind of cultural revelation, and it centers on Tom Ridge, whom all my friends think is a bumpkin because he doesn't look and sound like them. Janitor’s son wins scholarship to Harvard, gets elected governor. Yet my friends think he’s a dummy. The reason: because he’s utterly without guile. To me he is emblematic of what’s great about the country – a guy who leaves his cushy governorship and therefore his wife has to go get a job to pay the bills because they have new rent to pay, and goes to Washington to help. And his staff is the same way.

"Sure they don’t do everything right, but they work their asses off and take all kinds of s**t from the press and the pundits and just keep their heads down and do the job they said they would do. The book is full of poignant scenes of these decent people just plain working hard and making sacrifices. No politics. No bulls**t. No glory. No scouring the papers for news clips about themselves."
The left hates that - real people doing a real job, the way most Americans do theirs. No macchiavellian intrigues, little evident sense of career entitlement; just people doing the job they were sent to do.

Can looks be deceiving? Of course - but the intense animus of the left is not a sham.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/6/2003 08:52:42 PM

Troops? War? - Terry Eastland of the Weekly Standard asks the question - is it possible to support the troops but oppose the war? To Eastland, the answer is "no":
Rep. Charles Rangel of New York has stated it succinctly: "We support the troops, but we don't support the president."

That is morally better than supporting our troops "when they shoot their officers." Yet what does it mean, what can it mean, to support the troops but not the president?

Not very much. The protesters "support" the troops in the sense that they hope our men and women in uniform will be okay, notwithstanding their dangerous environment. To spell out the obvious, they hope our troops won't suffer death or injury or capture, nor hunger, nor (too much) sleep deprivation, nor (another) blinding sandstorm.

But note that the protesters' "support" doesn't extend to the troops' actual mission. Consider that the oath of enlistment obligates each soldier to obey "the orders of the president of the United States." President Bush's orders to disarm Iraq and effect regime change, given to the Pentagon and our armed forces, are precisely what the protesters oppose. Thus, they are unable to support our armed forces in Iraq in the discharge of the very responsibility they have accepted and that matters most to the country--the execution of their mission.
I'm more and more inclined to agree. A soldier's life and well-being is deeply interconnected with his/her mission. If the soldier fails to accomplish the mission, it's usually because they've been harmed in some drastic way - or they've abandoned the mission, rendering their and their comrades' sacrifice vain.

Supporting the troops while opposing the mission is logical, in the same way that wishing for puppies not to die is logical; it feels good, but there's really no logical basis to the idea.

posted by Mitch Berg 4/6/2003 12:57:55 PM

Compassionate Caring Liberals In Action - The death of Michael Kelly brought out quite a reaction among the Democratic Underground. Much of it, unforunately, was nose-hair-curlingly awful.

I'm imagining what would have happened had a conservative reaction to Paul Wellstone's death like some of these morons.

Indymedia has also held forth with its characteristic invincible inflammatory ignorance.

(Via Rachel Lucas and Right Wing News and Jeff Fecke)

posted by Mitch Berg 4/6/2003 10:00:13 AM

Hentoff - A genuine liberal and genuine libertarian, Nat Hentoff, comments about why he didn't march with the anti-war protesters this time:
I did not cite "weapons of mass destruction." Nor do I believe Saddam Hussein is a direct threat to this country, any more than the creators of the mass graves in the Balkans were, or the Taliban. And as has been evident for a long time, I am no admirer of George W. Bush.

The United Nations? Did the inspectors go into the prisons and the torture chambers? Would they have, if given more time? Did they interview the Mukhabarat, Saddam's dreaded secret police?

An Iraqi in Detroit wanted to send a message to the anti-war protesters: "If you want to protest that it's not OK to send your kids to fight, that's OK. But please don't claim to speak for the Iraqis."
The article catalogues some of the same Hussein atrocities that the rest of the world - or the part of it that isn't run by Josh Bartlett - has become familiar with. Some of them turn the stomach:
The UN is crucial for feeding people and trying to deal with such plagues as AIDS; but if you had been in a Hussein torture chamber, would you, even in a state of delirium, hope for rescue from the UN Security Council?

From Amnesty International, for whom human rights are not just a slogan, on Iraq: "Common methods of physical torture included electric shocks or cigarette burns to various parts of the body, pulling out fingernails, rape. . . . Two men, Zaher al-Zuhairi and Fares Kadhem Akia, reportedly had their tongues cut out for slandering the president by members of Feda'iyye Saddam, a militia created in 1994. The amputations took place in a public square in Diwaniya City, south of Baghdad."

As John Burns of The New York Times wrote in January: "History may judge that the stronger case [for an American-led invasion] . . . was the one that needed no [forbidden arms] inspectors to confirm: that Saddam Hussein, in his 23 years in power, plunged this country into a bloodbath of medieval proportions, and exported some of that terror to his neighbors."
As I wrote in my "Death Factory" piece yesterday, I've had about enough of the anti-Bush movement's specious claims. The last time I went to an anti-Bush rally, I was a passive observer. Next time, I'm speaking up, asking the questions.

I've had enough.

Fade - The anti-Bush movement had a bad day in Boston yesterday.

I'll be going to the Wednesday ritual demonstration on the Lake Street Bridge to see what attendance is like.

Anyone wanna meet under a "Liberate Iraq" sign? Strength in numbers, y'know...

posted by Mitch Berg 4/6/2003 09:25:07 AM

  Berg's Law of Liberal Iraq Commentary:

In attacking the reasons for war, no liberal commentator is capable of addressing more than one of the justifications at a time; to do so would introduce a context in which their argument can not survive

Best Shots

American Bankers and the Media
Tanks for the Memories!
The Untouchables
The Class System
The DFL Deck of Cards
For The Children
The Pope of Bruce
The Blogosphere Blacklist
Keillor, Again
Open Letter to Keillor
More...

Articles
Links

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
The Northern Alliance of Blogs
Fraters Libertas
Lileks
Powerline
SCSU Scholars
and the Commish

Blogs
 

Big Media
Frankfurter Allgemeine
St. Paul Pioneer Press
Minneapolis Star/Tribune
Jamestown Sun

Niche Media
Reason
Center for the American Experiment
National Review Online
Drudge
Backstreets
WSJ's OpinionJournal
Toquevillian

Other Blogs from my Kids and I
Daryll's "Horses and Orlando"
Sam's "Comic Post"
Rock's So Tough - the Iron City Houserockers

Mental Shrapnel
Ian Whitney's MN Bloggers
Day By Day
Bureaucrash
CuriousFurious
MN Concealed Carry Reform Now
The Onion
James Randi Educational Foundation
The Self-Made Critic
Book of Ratings

Current Issue
Archives

Contact Me!

Iraqi Democracy graphic

Support democracy and human rights in Iraq!

Free Weintraub

Everything on this site (c) Mitch Berg.  All non-quoted opinions are mine.

Site Meter visitors, more or less, since 9/13/03

Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com