Is there a career option as solid in the long term as being a leftist alarmist, whether one is never, ever right or merely always wrong?
No. There is not.
Is there a career option as solid in the long term as being a leftist alarmist, whether one is never, ever right or merely always wrong?
No. There is not.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
does it count if your conclusion is right but for the wrong reason
he is right that civilization as we know it is about to end
but not because of overpopulation
because of intentional devolution
to a lower form of civilization
that relies not on petrol
or even on wood but
on wishful thinking
and fear for the
few who survive
in the mut huts
and caves
alone
in
related
news it seems
those who claimed
putin was not only hitler
but was satan himself are
behind the times as putin
declared a ceasefire for
orthodox christmas
a church which
the savior of
ukraine
bans
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/putin-orders-ceasefire-in-ukraine-over-orthodox-christmas-kremlin/ar-AA160F7m
“As the result of continuing increases in crop productivity, the world has reached peak agricultural land which means that more land will be freed up to revert to nature as the century evolves. ”
WTF??
Oh, wait; Reason magazine…lol 🤡
Neo-cons crumble/
Where does M Berg go to now?/
Lolbertarians/
Static analysis is a staple of small minds, especially “experts.”
Food is a good example. Ehrlich explicitly assumed no change and that people would willing walk to the grave. Some folks took exception to that and decided to innovate and lo and behold, the problem went away.
And it’s not just food. Remember “Peak Oil?” Oil was getting scarce, folks decided to innovate, and it became plentiful until the Incompetent In Chief decided to not produce as much as we could. It could be plentiful now, “we” just choose not to allow that.
Where does M Berg go to now?/
Care to elaborate?
“Reason” is a libertarian magazine. It’s useful for lols, but not much else
The Libertarian Party, and especially Reason magazine, are funded by donors who make their money from dope and porn, and it shows.
We aren’t talking about principled political thinkers here.
Pingback: In The Mailbox: 01.05.23 : The Other McCain
nerdbert;
The term “Fossil Fuels” was actually coined by John D. Rockefeller back when he founded Standard Oil. He wanted it to imply scarcity to drive sales. Of course, he also decried competition as unconstitutional.