There’s little I can say about the passing of Nelson Mandela that many others haven’t already said better.
I watched a little of CNN’s wall-to-wall coverage yesterday – and was struck not so much by the elegiac coverage of Mandela and his life (deservedly so) as by the ninety seconds’ revisionist hate hate that the likes of Christiane Amanpour were directing back at Ronald Reagan.
Of course, history records the fact that Reagan opposed legislation that would have confronted the Pretoria government over apartheid. It was the only veto of his that the Democrats ever overrode.
The left has tried to portray this as racism, then and now.
That, of course, relies on hindsight.
The ANC was far from above terrorist activity, before and during Mandela’s imprisonment; his wife Winnie was fingered in numerous murders, kidnappings, assaults and other human rights violations, and she vocally endorsed the practice of “necklacing” political opponents (jamming a car tire around them and lighting them on fire – a particularly hideous form of premeditated murder).
If a group using rhetoric like the ANC’s were operating in the US today, being on Janet Napolitano’s watch list would be the least of their legal worries.
And the track record of Mandela’s contemporaries was pretty ghastly. Robert Mugabe’s revolt against white rule was successful – at the price of pretty much destroying Zimbabwe, which remains a less onerous place then North Korea today only because of the incompetence of the state’s agents. Other similar nationalists in places like Mozambique, Uganda, Tanzania, Kenya, Angola and the Congo/Zaire created vastly more trouble than they solved.
So Mandela’s greatest accomplishment was not that he toppled white rule – that was going to happen eventually one way or another, by war, ballot or negotiation. It was that he managed to do it without plunging South Africa into the nightmarish miasma of misery that’s attended the rule of virtually all of his contemporaries; that he and the transitional government he led accomplished the job of changing South Africa without descending into (much of) the orgy of retributive violence that greeted the assumption of black rule in Zimbabwe, or the wholesale destruction of economies, societies and uncounted masses of lives in Ethiopia, Angola, Mozambique, and a raft of other sub-Saharan nations.
Reagan, it is fair to say, got Mandela wrong. It is not, however, fair to say there wasn’t ample precedent for believing South Africa could have turned out much worse than it did.
And the post-apartheid story is not only still being written – it’s not that great for South Africa. The ANC’s post-Mandela leadership has proved corrupt and incompetent. As most of sub-Saharan Africa slowly claws it’s way to sustainability, South Africa is in economic decline. Hindsight in view of South Africa’s current reality makes Mandela look as much a hero of principled competence as the statuesque moral lesson that’s leading all the newscasts today.
Which is a great elegy for a historic hero; that his reality match his legend.
The Twin Cities leftyblogosphere is full of people who like to bleat “racist” at the faintest questioning of their orthodoxy. I’ll urge anyone wanting to do so in my comment section to arrange a time and place to say so to my face instead.
Fair warning: you won’t like how it ends. But your comments will be removed at best, mutilated for my enjoyment at worst, so don’t bother leaving your drivel here.
Personally, I have to wonder if Reagan’s opposition to the ANC had something to do with its moderation from extreme positions.
Progressives embrace change, ignoring history and hoping for the best.
Conservatives are skeptical of change, remembering history and fearing the worst. Reagan, in the traditional all Conservatives and considering the evidence at the time, declined to meddle in the internal affairs of a sovereign state.
My hero.
There is the fact that the ANC was friendly to the Soviet Union.
The situation in South Africa at the time was that there were two sides engaged in despicable behavior and, much like Syria now, the best that could be hoped for was that both sides would lose.
And in essence, both sides did lose. The apartheid system collapsed, and the thuggish Winnie-led ANC was ousted from power by Nelson Mandela (and Nelson also did boot Winnie from his personal life, which was a big statement about her behavior in general). Unfortunately, Nelson never did fully root out the corruption at the head of the ANC and we’re seeing the problems now.
And I’m sure that Mandela was a card carrying member of the Communist party at the time really warmed the Gipper’s heart.
Pingback: I Heard It On The NARN | Shot in the Dark
Mandela differs from Mugabe in two particulars: He gave up on the idea of nationalizing industry after the fall of the Soviet Union, and he actually relinquished power when his term was up.
“Reagan, it is fair to say, got Mandela [a little] wrong.”
The Republican-controlled Senate voted 78 to 21 to override Mr. Reagan’s veto. The House vote was 313 to 83.