shotbanner.jpeg

September 12, 2006

Question for Conspiracy Theorists

If the Bush Administration was ingenious enough to sneak tons of explosives into the World Trade Center to bring it down in a controlled implosion...

...then why didn't they plant a couple of WMDs in Iraq just to make things look right? A used Russian nuke or a couple of trucks full of Korean war surplus Mustard gas would have done the trick, right?

Just curious.

Posted by Mitch at September 12, 2006 06:57 AM | TrackBack
Comments

Isn't it obvious? BushHowdy McChimplerBurton *wants* his enemies (you know, Nancy Pelosi and Charlie Rangel) to know that he's a crazed lunatic who'll go in on any pretense. Keeps them on their toes. Look out, Paris, you're next!

Posted by: Brian Jones at September 12, 2006 08:42 AM

Why hit the Pentagon? Why make themselves look so foolish in the aftermath? Why not set up a better scenario?

Posted by: Kermit at September 12, 2006 07:28 PM

Kermit,

Explaining logic to a moonbat is like explaining dehydration to a fish--a complete waste of time.

Posted by: RBMN at September 13, 2006 01:04 PM

The conspiracy theory is stupid on so many levels. The question Why didn't the Bush administration phony up some WMDs in Iraq? is one I've used to try to cure the deluded on this score. And even if one favors the "less nutty" idea that Bush simply let the attacks happen, do you suppose he would trust the terrorists not to target the White House? Stupid, stupid, stupid.

Posted by: angryclown at September 13, 2006 01:44 PM

brande roderick movie uncensored malayalam movie

Posted by: Ikkujclwoof at October 9, 2006 12:24 AM

beast sex zoo zoofilia anal

Posted by: Ljokosgl at October 10, 2006 01:24 AM

milf trailers donna doll milf

Posted by: Tatau at October 10, 2006 12:47 PM

midget pissing guys pissing in urinals

Posted by: Yaamssuakn at October 24, 2006 12:36 PM

sexual rape milf rape

Posted by: Kgyfaqoa at October 30, 2006 01:30 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?
hi