If the Bush Administration was ingenious enough to sneak tons of explosives into the World Trade Center to bring it down in a controlled implosion...
...then why didn't they plant a couple of WMDs in Iraq just to make things look right? A used Russian nuke or a couple of trucks full of Korean war surplus Mustard gas would have done the trick, right?
Just curious.
Posted by Mitch at September 12, 2006 06:57 AM | TrackBack
Isn't it obvious? BushHowdy McChimplerBurton *wants* his enemies (you know, Nancy Pelosi and Charlie Rangel) to know that he's a crazed lunatic who'll go in on any pretense. Keeps them on their toes. Look out, Paris, you're next!
Posted by: Brian Jones at September 12, 2006 08:42 AMWhy hit the Pentagon? Why make themselves look so foolish in the aftermath? Why not set up a better scenario?
Posted by: Kermit at September 12, 2006 07:28 PMKermit,
Explaining logic to a moonbat is like explaining dehydration to a fish--a complete waste of time.
Posted by: RBMN at September 13, 2006 01:04 PMThe conspiracy theory is stupid on so many levels. The question Why didn't the Bush administration phony up some WMDs in Iraq? is one I've used to try to cure the deluded on this score. And even if one favors the "less nutty" idea that Bush simply let the attacks happen, do you suppose he would trust the terrorists not to target the White House? Stupid, stupid, stupid.
Posted by: angryclown at September 13, 2006 01:44 PMbrande roderick movie uncensored malayalam movie
Posted by: Ikkujclwoof at October 9, 2006 12:24 AMbeast sex zoo zoofilia anal
Posted by: Ljokosgl at October 10, 2006 01:24 AMmilf trailers donna doll milf
Posted by: Tatau at October 10, 2006 12:47 PMmidget pissing guys pissing in urinals
Posted by: Yaamssuakn at October 24, 2006 12:36 PMsexual rape milf rape
Posted by: Kgyfaqoa at October 30, 2006 01:30 PM